Who Makes End of Life Decisions When There is No Medical Directive?
Say someone is no longer able to make medical decisions concerning their end of life care. What happens now?
First, the doctors and family will look to see if the patient has a valid Advance Health Care Directive.
Say the patient never prepared an Advance Health Care Directive. What happens now?
Second, state law may dictate who has priority of making medical decisions. Not all states have such laws defining the hierarchy of who can make medical decisions for those unable to. California doesn't have any laws on the books regarding this.
California does have Probate Code Section 3200 et. seq., which offers a court procedure to petition the court to assist with the decision making process in the absence of an Advance Health Care Directive. There is also two other court avenues that may be taken -- one is to obtain a conservatorship over the person or petition the court for substituted judgment.
I can already tell you that without explaining the nuances of any of these procedures, they are costly in terms of court filing fees, legal fees and have a high emotional cost while waiting for a judge to decide on the fate of your loved one.
Third, some medical institutions also have manuals or policies dictating who should make medical decisions in the absence of an Advance Health Care Directive. Check with the hospital where your loved one is at for end of life care to see if they have such procedures in place.
All in all, not having an Advance Health Care Directive stating your preferences for end of life wishes may cause your loved ones untold agony and discord especially if your loved ones don't agree.
Downey Office
Irvine Office
Long Beach Office