I received an email today from a blog reader asking about a hypothetical situation:
Say you and your spouse die together. Your married child inherits your estate. A year later your child dies. The child's surviving spouse gets everything and enjoys the rest of their life with your money, spending it on God-only-knows-what... with a new lover, to boot.
What can you do to avoid this? What if you do not want your children's spouse to inherit your estate in a situation described above?
One way would be to set up a Living Trust that says that your child can inherit your estate, but it must remain in trust for your child's lifetime or until your child reaches a certain age.
You can give the trustee discretion on how to allocate the funds for your child. It could be distributed to your child with complete discretion by the trustee. Or you could state that the trustee must distribute income and any principal is discretionary. Or you can say that the trustee must distribute both income and principal at certain intervals.
It's a bit complicated to understand, but try this:
Say you don't care for your daughter-in-law "Floozy." Floozy is married to your only child, your "Son." You can set up a Living Trust to give your entire estate to Son to be held in trust for Son's lifetime. The trustee can be a corporate trustee to ensure continuity and consistent management.
If Son dies then you state who the contingent beneficiaries are -- your Son's children, your nieces and nephews or maybe a charitable organization. This will prevent Floozy from getting the rest of your money if Son dies too soon.
This situation only works if you have a larger versus a smaller estate.
Another way would be if your estate consists of just a home, you could put your home into your Living Trust and allow your Son to have a life estate in the home for the remainder of his life and then upon his death the home would go to your alternate beneficiary.
Or you could state in your Living Trust that Son is to get 5% of the trust assets every year until he reaches age 50 (or whatever age you choose) and then he gets the remainder of your estate outright at that age. At which point there's not much left.
But if your Son inherits property in California, it is considered separate property and not an asset of the marriage so long as your Son keeps the property separate from Floozy and does not otherwise commingle the funds with community property funds.
And, lastly, if your Son were wise, he could set up his own Living Trust to catch his inheritance and devise it straight to his children or keep it in his family bypassing Floozy so long as it were not community property. In this instance, Son's estate may lose the benefit of the marital deduction for his entire estate if the separate property inheritance and the community property portion exceed the federal estate tax exemption amount.
Lots of issues. It depends on your situation, your assets and your wishes. And there are other options -- these are just a few.
Talk to an estate planning attorney to help you devise the best approach for your estate plan based on your wishes.
Thanks to the blog reader for emailing me this terrific hypothetical!